powerule: I CAN only hit the target if I aim up 1 oclock
CandRreviews: If you like having a safety I would go with the Ruger. If you don't mind a
break in period and want a superb trigger, I would go with the Kahr. The
Ruger has been superior when it comes to accuracy after further testing but
you should be able to get great groups with both guns. They both run about
the same price and I don't think you could go wrong with either.
GottaBeekiddin: So you can't shoot the Kahr, that doesn't mean that the Ruger is a better
gun. You just need more trigger time with the Kahr.
sham8723: Right.... but the buyer is interested in the basic potential accuracy of
the gun...dude has a point, although he's a bit unnecessarily hostile in
how he expresses it.
Timmy Tim: I was very interested in getting the PM9 because of its compact size for
CCW... but as everyone knows the PM9 is pricey!!! around $700 for it. What
are the big differences between the CM9 and the PM9?
gauchitosimone: you still have both firearms? Which one do you prefer?
seth3000gt: I like your videos but it seemed like in this one you kept defending the
Kahr buy leaving stuff out and adding in something bad about the LC9. Like
the safety lever on the LC9 for example, you say the LC9 is a tad thinner,
"but, the safety lever sticks way out so." True, but then you forgot to
mention the huge slide stop on the Kahr. U fired the LC9 more acc. but then
hurry and give the Kahr a second chance. I could go on, but I wont. Don't
take this in a negative way. Just feedback for you.
seth3000gt: As far as triggers go in my opinion after shooting both, the Kahr is
superior as far as a target/range gun goes(lighter, shorter, crisper) , but
for a panic high stress defensive situation? the LC9's could be superior.
And one other detail that is critical for future buyers is that you must
use the slide stop to chamber the first round on the Kahr. Even the manual
states it. The LC9 is not perfect, but the Kahr isn't any closer. Apples to
apples really. Take care keep the videos coming.
Alex Garcia: Good comparison & good video!
8025chris: The LC9 is a much better pistol.
choprules: Chad, I was able to tighten up my grouping by only using the first pad of
my trigger finger. Even using the first finger joint was too deep on the
trigger and I would pull my shots ever so slight. Give the first pad a try
and see if it helps.
jlmcgrot: well, to be fair, the Ruger is shorter if you remove that pinky extension
WHEN comparing 7 round magazines. Those Kahr magazines are one of the
biggest head scratchers in handguns. Of course, I'd rather have the 6
rounder for carry.
IIDASHII: True story. The first time a shot a Kahr I HATED it. I've since gotten used
to the trigger, and I want a PM9 BADLY!! They are GREAT little guns.
marine25411: You're really trying hard to find reasons to choose the Kahr. The Ruger
grouped much better than the Kahr. Buy a laser for the Ruger and adjust it.
The Ruger also has an adjustable sight. Be like Fox news, man. Give us the
facts and let us decide. Also, did you fire from a rest or sandbags. Off
hand accuracy testing is a waste of time.
William Jabines: I still use my HP-22 with 40 grs CCI Mini Mag bullets. I can place all ten
in the face/head in a full size targets within 10 yrds.
JPBill2: Once you get used to the CM9 trigger and sights you should be able to shoot
2" groups at 21 feet rapid fire. The Kahr trigger is far superior to the
CandRreviews: @marine25411 If I had aimed the LC9 at the bullseye it would have grouped
off the paper. I have had 3 others shoot it and all shot it super low and
to the right. The CM9 has a far superior trigger. Off hand shooting is how
you shoot in a defensive situation, you're not going to ask a robber to
stand still while you grab a bench and sand bags. If you can't shoot a gun
and group well off hand then there is no point carrying it. These videos
are our opinions, if you don't like then don't watch!
Bob Solla: i changed out my kahr cm9 sights from two dot factory to 3 dot trijicon and
wow!;what a difference!the kahr is definitely a superior shooter than the
ruger lc9!i`am sure after getiing more range time,i`m sure you`re shooting
Powerpickle68: Ammo is important when it comes to accuracy! What ammo were you using? I
have a Glock 19 and shooting Blazer brass 115 grain fmj,I can't group for
shiznit at 25 feet. With S&B 115 grain fmj at 25 feet it is fantastic.
Sorry I have to nit pick but its because there are so many accuracy reviews
that never talk about the ammo when ammo is very important. My friends Sig
p250 loves federal 115 fmj,great accuracy! but it hates Herters like its a
passion of hate.
CandRreviews: @JerryG1911 Sorry man! I was actually disappointed with the Ruger. It is
shooting way atleast 5-6 inches low. I was rushing my shots with the CM9
because of the trigger. You are going to have to show me how it's done :)
JerryG1911: You make my gun look like crap chad hahaha jk!!! good comparison bro!
Kahr CM9 vs Ruger LC9: Accuracy and Size Comparison4.2
out of 5