adrianTNT: The video looks a bit washed out, can you tell me if the original is like
that too? I wonder if lens hood would make it look better.
David Duran: Hey Guys, love the review. Where is the location of the Bald Eagles shot
at? This is a really nifty camera.
amSeehafen: Hi, thank you for sharing, because I´m intending to buy the sx50, too. To
me this video looks a bit overexposed though. So how do you like your Canon
SX50 over all?
MikedieONE: dude... the aperture has nothing to do with the image quality in this case
-.- beside the SX40 has F2.7 check out this review: techradar.
(delete the space before the .com) There you can see how supperior the SX50
is in terms of Imageqaulity (Noise performence, Dynamic range) in both RAW
and JPEG! Its a fact!
Walter Gramer: that last photo!!! =O wow
DreamBoulevard: They must make a special cannon just for Germany with F2.8 then.
MikedieONE: sorry but you talk bullcrap. im sure you DONT have the SX50. Because i
follow tests about it in many forums(not only by testpages but also by
normal people). And the Result is, the SX50 is superior to the FZ200 by
far! for example the FZ200 has the same Noise result in ISO 400 like the
SX50 has in ISO1600! You cant even compare the SX30 here. it was crap. the
SX30 had horrible noise results and very bad CA. but infact the SX30 had a
totaly different sensor (CCD) and no UD elements on the lens.
8976010: i own the SX 40....nice video :)
DreamBoulevard: Yeah in their test the canon came up trumps over the Lumix, I got two brand
new cameras myself and did the tests side by side and got different
results. The Canon out of the box couldnt match the Lumix out of the box in
the real world. What they get sent to test isnt always what we get over the
counter. The same happened with test results shown for the SX30 when they
came out, they were awesome. The SX30 that I and 2 friends bought ended up
being quite crap and nothing like the results Id seen.
princecody: I like my current Panasonic lumix fz150 camera
JoeSzilagy: I'll likely keep my SX40 as a spare (rather than take a big loss in selling
it), and get the SX50 for at least a few reasons. Along with the bigger
zoom (and even a little differance can be a lot in some cases), the RAW and
steadier image stabilization, are worth it alone! Think I'll wait for sale
prices just before Christmas though, or next Fall when they lower the price
to make way for what- a 60X zoom and mic input?!
monacoeye: Many thanks for these videos - v useful reviews. @Groocx AFA digital zoom
goes not that easy to crop a video on computer. @driverstorer I'd love to
see side-by-side photos of a digital zoom crop and a real crop on the
computer - the in-camera algorithm looks good, but we can't really know for
sure. Re low light vid - how did you think that performed compared to
competition? - didn't look that great to me and ISO 6400 seems on the low
side but I don't know much about video.
evedfwef: Hello Canon Powershot SX50 I'm such a camera buy. Can you do a special
video from the 50's? Thank!
MikedieONE: nope its not. SX40/sx50 still has better image quality than the FZ200.
especially at higher iso levels.
driverstorer: the description is devoted to that information. cheers!
paperjeepsdotcom: first off, the digital zoom on these cameras is much better than the
inferior cameras of the past, but of course you still won't get print
quality photos at 100% size in photoshop. However, very fun to play with in
open areas and photos look sharp enough for sharing online, which is what
many people solely use a camera for nowadays. i would really miss the
digital zoom on this particular camera. ive taken print quality pics at
full optical zoom without a tripod as well, great cameras.
driverstorer: Check out /user/DigitalMediaProTV for more in-depth reviews and functions
of the camera. Thanks for watching!
Thokko: Digitally zoomed photos look absolutely horrible! Canon and other makers
should stop making the digtal zoom function! I get 50 times better image
quality with a 0.95 megapixel Sony digital camera from 1999 than any
digitally zoomed photo! Digital Zoom should be DEAD such as the megapixel
craze from the early to mid 2000's.
Craigsnedeker: It's pretty rare to catch the Eagles just sitting there. Nice video!
DigitalMediaProTV: Thats the problem with eagles, for their body to be correctly exposed their
heads are over exposed because they're white.
RaFa NaLdo: /watch?v=BCIk4pQiaY4 CANON SX50 HS
Rahul Potluri: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 Mac OS X 10.5 and above
DreamBoulevard: I own an SX30 which was awesome when new but just bought a lumix fz200 as
well. It doesnt have the zoom of the cannons but the picture and video
quality is the new class leader.
Grroocx: The SX40 has an equivalency to a traditional 35mm lens of 24-840mm. The
SX50 has an equivalency to a traditional 35mm lens of 24-1200mm. A maximum
telephoto comparison between the two is a comparison of 840mm to 1200mm,
which is the same as comparing x16.8 power to x24 power. As the new
record-holder for telephoto, the SX50 brings us 24 times closer, max. When
a person moves from "optical" to "digital" specs, he's just talking about
on-camera cropping, which anyone can do on-computer anyway.
Rahul Potluri: if you are a stalker, this is the camera for you.
LesleytheBirdNerd: Why does mine have this loud feed back noise when I zoom out? If the lens
is not zoomed out there is no noise it only happens once I zoom out in the
slightest. Sounds like there is near by rushing water, is this normal? I
only bought this a week ago any help would be great
Charity Lu Lu: That eagle has nice hair ! Not bald lol!
concho195: Anyone. Is sx50 compatible with vista basic?
ManSpeedCore: take a shot when record video !?!??omg
Canon SX50 vs SX40 Zoom Test - Bald Eagles4.8
out of 5